As an Educator, I am a Leader: Theory Characteristics and Traits
How can I use this content to increase my
academic influence?
As an Educator, I am a Leader:
Theory Characteristics and Traits
Situational Leadership requires flexibility, empathy and sympathy on
the part of the leader in that it requires them to adjust their style, of which
may not be their natural way of leadership.
Contingency Theory includes a leader’s motivation, be they motivated
by task or relationship and how that impacts the leader’s interaction with the
situation and the follower (Burns, Sorenson, Goethals, 2004). Due to the fact that this theory is focused on
what the leader brings to the table, it allows them to lead naturally. Finally, proof of effectiveness of the
Contingency model relies primarily on group performance (Fiedler, 1978)
Transformational Leadership includes inspiration, transaction, individual focus, critical thought
encouragement, purpose clarity and/or setting the example. Additional elements include the “Four I’s” of
Individual Consideration, “Intellectual Stimulation Inspirational Motivation,
Idealized Influence (Kessler, 2013; Sosik & Jung, 2010).
Authentic Leadership Theory (ALT) includes areas such as self-awareness,
self-regulation, ethical standards, developmental focus (Gardner, Avolio, &
Walumbwa, 2005) and involves a leader’s awareness of how they think and behave, of their
values & morals, knowledge, strengths and operational context (Avolio,
Gardner, Walumbwa, Luthans & May, 2004)
LMX theory does not focus on the specific characteristics of the
leader, per se, but on the relationships between a leader and subordinates
causing two “camps” in the team, the “in-group” of which the relationship with
the leader is fair, and the “out-group” of which the relationship is
minimal. (Power, 2013).
Using Path-Goal Theory, leaders choose to be
directive, achievement-oriented, supportive or participative toward the
subordinate depending on the task, subordinate characteristics and the nature
of the subordinates group (Burns, Sorenson, Goethals, 2004). This theory is influenced
by motivational theories such as Vroom’s Expectancy Theory (1964) and the
leader “sees themselves as guides
and focus on helping others...”
(Maxwell, 2010).
Team Leadership is used to positively influence the individuals as to influence
the team in the “four areas of cognition, motivation, affect, &
coordination” (Bailey & Clegg, 2007).
Self-reflection: Which of the characteristics
tend to arise as I lead?
What effect does it have on influence? How can
I adjust if needed?
References
Avolio, B., Gardner, W.,
Walumbwa, F., Luthans, F., & May, D. (2004). Unlocking
the mask: A look at the process by which authentic
leaders impact follower attitudes and
behaviors. The leadership quarterly, 15(6),
801-823.
Bailey, J., & Clegg,
S. (2007). International encyclopedia
of organization studies. London:
SAGE Publications, Inc.
Burns, J., Sorenson, G., Goethals, G., (2004). Encyclopedia
of leadership. Thousand Oaks,
Calif:
SAGE Publications, Inc.
Fiedler, F. E., & Garcia, J. E. (1987). New approaches to effective leadership:
Cognitive
resources
and organizational performance. New York:Wiley.
Gardner, W. L., Avolio,
B. J., & Walumbwa, F. O. (Eds.).
(2005). Authentic leadership theory
and
practice: Origins, effects and
development (Vol. 3). Elsevier.
Kessler, E. H.
(2013). Encyclopedia of management
theory. Thousand Oaks, California:
SAGE
Publications, Inc.
Maxwell, J. C.
(2010). Everyone communicates, few connect: What the most effective people
do
Maxwell, J. C. (2018). NIV, Maxwell Leadership Bible. Thomas Nelson.
Power, R. L. (2013). Leader-member exchange theory in higher and
distance education.
International
Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(4), 1–9.
Sosik, J., & Jung,
D. (2010). Full range leadership development: Pathways for people, profit,
and planet.
Routledge.
Vroom, V. H. (1964).
Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.
Comments
Post a Comment